MattisManzel:
I started art and I realize that there is a central issue about the [[licence?]] of all the possible results of the collaborative activities - artistic, non-artistic, whatever - during a wiki-Woodstock. Could we make this as free and open as possible? How?
The point is figuring out what combinations of applications have what possibilities. We should try to make a map on that. Offering many ideas is good. It’s all just recommendations anyhow.
Exampel, moon-edit and wiki:
Imagine some five, six wiki-interested people on a moon-edit page. Imagine three such pages. On every page one person has started up a wiki short ago and would like to know. So they take the “first impression test”. Everybody takes a look at the wiki for five minutes, then there are another five minutes for commonly writing a short first impression with what to improve most urgently. And rightaway exporting all the result to the respective wiki. In an hour on all three wikis - as there is always a delay - there are precious tipps on how to improve them. 15 folks had an interesting time learning a lot how other people see a page. [[first-impression-test?]]?
Sebastien said a page like volunteer-board misses where you can list with your name as intereted to help. Stupid mistake. What’s the best name for that? volunteer-board can be renamed.