odd-wiki-hive / odd-wiki-list odd-wiki-Zentrum-de odd-wiki-center-en odd-wiki-centre-fr odd-wiki-centro-it edit
today's
talk
hive-list changes special

AllTalkInTheHive

front

all talk in the hive

http://helios.wmid.amu.edu.pl/~sheep/mattis/image/Pic.321.png The talk in all wikis in the odd-wiki-hive

This page contains an inclusion of the soup group: odd-wiki all talk which in turn is composed of the talk-feeds of all wikis in the odd-wiki-hive. Please keep the soup group manually synchronized with the hive-list.

The alternative page [AllTalkInTheHiveDirectly? all talk in the hive, directly] includes the talk-feeds of the odd-wikis directly without using soup.io and takes longer to load. Patience, please.

This page does not automatically refresh when a day-page “talk” included into it from an odd-wiki has been changed. Please force a refresh (Firefox: shift + click reload).

Currently included into this page:

Click a number [n] to read aggregated information about a obm-wiki.


all talk in the wikis in the odd-wiki-hive

2008-09-18

  • 11:54 UTC Talk

    odd-wiki-hive / 'wiki-net'

    odd-wiki-hive / 'wiki-net': talk the rss-feed for the talk in the 'wiki-net'
    [en]

    conglomeration of intelligence

    MattisManzel:
    Imagine the wiki-net worked, imagine a bit into the future, please. Every wiki-community cares for their wiki-net pages, every page wiki-net draws a picture of the current neighborhood relations and interests of a wiki-community.
    AlexSchroeder said “wikis are nomads”. I agree. Currently moving a wiki from one hive to another - because the wiki has more ties and friends in the hive it moves to and thus “feels better” for example - is a pain in the … Imagine it wouldn’t. Just imagine.
    If so then couldn’t one write some code voodoo that analyses the wiki-nets of the wikis in the one big soup and figures out dynamically what wikis have the most ties to each other and - automatically - groups these wikis together in a hive? Automigration, kind of. Optimal grouping together wikis based on the information on the page wiki-net of every wiki. Conglomeration of intelligence. …
    Or, probably better, not caring on what server (hives are currently server based) wikis run on at all and composing a “hive” = a temporary togetherness from wikis running on different servers. “Hive” as a mere idea, not as a physical fact anymore.

    Or both?

    Ok, just had to pin that down, cu.


  • 11:54 UTC Talk

    odd-wiki-hive / 'wiki-net'

    odd-wiki-hive / 'wiki-net': talk the rss-feed for the talk in the 'wiki-net'
    [en]

    conglomeration of intelligence

    MattisManzel:
    Imagine the wiki-net worked, imagine a bit into the future, please. Every wiki-community cares for their wiki-net pages, every page wiki-net draws a picture of the current neighborhood relations and interests of a wiki-community.
    AlexSchroeder said “wikis are nomads”. I agree. Currently moving a wiki from one hive to another - because the wiki has more ties and friends in the hive it moves to and thus “feels better” for example - is a pain in the … Imagine it wouldn’t. Just imagine.
    If so then couldn’t one write some code voodoo that analyses the wiki-nets of the wikis in the one big soup and figures out dynamically what wikis have the most ties to each other and - automatically - groups these wikis together in a hive? Automigration, kind of. Optimal grouping together wikis based on the information on the page wiki-net of every wiki. Conglomeration of intelligence. …
    Or, probably better, not caring on what server (hives are currently server based) wikis run on at all and composing a “hive” = a temporary togetherness from wikis running on different servers. “Hive” as a mere idea, not as a physical fact anymore.

    Or both?

    Ok, just had to pin that down, cu.


  • 11:54 UTC Talk

    odd-wiki-hive / 'wiki-net'

    odd-wiki-hive / 'wiki-net': talk the rss-feed for the talk in the 'wiki-net'
    [en]

    conglomeration of intelligence

    MattisManzel:
    Imagine the wiki-net worked, imagine a bit into the future, please. Every wiki-community cares for their wiki-net pages, every page wiki-net draws a picture of the current neighborhood relations and interests of a wiki-community.
    AlexSchroeder said “wikis are nomads”. I agree. Currently moving a wiki from one hive to another - because the wiki has more ties and friends in the hive it moves to and thus “feels better” for example - is a pain in the … Imagine it wouldn’t. Just imagine.
    If so then couldn’t one write some code voodoo that analyses the wiki-nets of the wikis in the one big soup and figures out dynamically what wikis have the most ties to each other and - automatically - groups these wikis together in a hive? Automigration, kind of. Optimal grouping together wikis based on the information on the page wiki-net of every wiki. Conglomeration of intelligence. …
    Or, probably better, not caring on what server (hives are currently server based) wikis run on at all and composing a “hive” = a temporary togetherness from wikis running on different servers. “Hive” as a mere idea, not as a physical fact anymore.

    Or both?

    Ok, just had to pin that down, cu.


  • 11:54 UTC Talk

    odd-wiki-hive / 'wiki-net'

    odd-wiki-hive / 'wiki-net': talk the rss-feed for the talk in the 'wiki-net'
    [en]

    conglomeration of intelligence

    MattisManzel:
    Imagine the wiki-net worked, imagine a bit into the future, please. Every wiki-community cares for their wiki-net pages, every page wiki-net draws a picture of the current neighborhood relations and interests of a wiki-community.
    AlexSchroeder said “wikis are nomads”. I agree. Currently moving a wiki from one hive to another - because the wiki has more ties and friends in the hive it moves to and thus “feels better” for example - is a pain in the … Imagine it wouldn’t. Just imagine.
    If so then couldn’t one write some code voodoo that analyses the wiki-nets of the wikis in the one big soup and figures out dynamically what wikis have the most ties to each other and - automatically - groups these wikis together in a hive? Automigration, kind of. Optimal grouping together wikis based on the information on the page wiki-net of every wiki. Conglomeration of intelligence. …
    Or, probably better, not caring on what server (hives are currently server based) wikis run on at all and composing a “hive” = a temporary togetherness from wikis running on different servers. “Hive” as a mere idea, not as a physical fact anymore.

    Or both?

    Ok, just had to pin that down, cu.


  • 11:54 UTC Talk

    odd-wiki-hive / 'wiki-net'

    odd-wiki-hive / 'wiki-net': talk the rss-feed for the talk in the 'wiki-net'
    [en]

    conglomeration of intelligence

    MattisManzel:
    Imagine the wiki-net worked, imagine a bit into the future, please. Every wiki-community cares for their wiki-net pages, every page wiki-net draws a picture of the current neighborhood relations and interests of a wiki-community.
    AlexSchroeder said “wikis are nomads”. I agree. Currently moving a wiki from one hive to another - because the wiki has more ties and friends in the hive it moves to and thus “feels better” for example - is a pain in the … Imagine it wouldn’t. Just imagine.
    If so then couldn’t one write some code voodoo that analyses the wiki-nets of the wikis in the one big soup and figures out dynamically what wikis have the most ties to each other and - automatically - groups these wikis together in a hive? Automigration, kind of. Optimal grouping together wikis based on the information on the page wiki-net of every wiki. Conglomeration of intelligence. …
    Or, probably better, not caring on what server (hives are currently server based) wikis run on at all and composing a “hive” = a temporary togetherness from wikis running on different servers. “Hive” as a mere idea, not as a physical fact anymore.

    Or both?

    Ok, just had to pin that down, cu.


  • 11:54 UTC Talk

    odd-wiki-hive / 'wiki-net'

    odd-wiki-hive / 'wiki-net': talk the rss-feed for the talk in the 'wiki-net'
    [en]

    conglomeration of intelligence

    MattisManzel:
    Imagine the wiki-net worked, imagine a bit into the future, please. Every wiki-community cares for their wiki-net pages, every page wiki-net draws a picture of the current neighborhood relations and interests of a wiki-community.
    AlexSchroeder said “wikis are nomads”. I agree. Currently moving a wiki from one hive to another - because the wiki has more ties and friends in the hive it moves to and thus “feels better” for example - is a pain in the … Imagine it wouldn’t. Just imagine.
    If so then couldn’t one write some code voodoo that analyses the wiki-nets of the wikis in the one big soup and figures out dynamically what wikis have the most ties to each other and - automatically - groups these wikis together in a hive? Automigration, kind of. Optimal grouping together wikis based on the information on the page wiki-net of every wiki. Conglomeration of intelligence. …
    Or, probably better, not caring on what server (hives are currently server based) wikis run on at all and composing a “hive” = a temporary togetherness from wikis running on different servers. “Hive” as a mere idea, not as a physical fact anymore.

    Or both?

    Ok, just had to pin that down, cu.


  • 11:54 UTC Talk

    odd-wiki-hive / 'wiki-net'

    odd-wiki-hive / 'wiki-net': talk the rss-feed for the talk in the 'wiki-net'
    [en]

    conglomeration of intelligence

    MattisManzel:
    Imagine the wiki-net worked, imagine a bit into the future, please. Every wiki-community cares for their wiki-net pages, every page wiki-net draws a picture of the current neighborhood relations and interests of a wiki-community.
    AlexSchroeder said “wikis are nomads”. I agree. Currently moving a wiki from one hive to another - because the wiki has more ties and friends in the hive it moves to and thus “feels better” for example - is a pain in the … Imagine it wouldn’t. Just imagine.
    If so then couldn’t one write some code voodoo that analyses the wiki-nets of the wikis in the one big soup and figures out dynamically what wikis have the most ties to each other and - automatically - groups these wikis together in a hive? Automigration, kind of. Optimal grouping together wikis based on the information on the page wiki-net of every wiki. Conglomeration of intelligence. …
    Or, probably better, not caring on what server (hives are currently server based) wikis run on at all and composing a “hive” = a temporary togetherness from wikis running on different servers. “Hive” as a mere idea, not as a physical fact anymore.

    Or both?

    Ok, just had to pin that down, cu.


  • 11:54 UTC Talk

    odd-wiki-hive / 'wiki-net'

    odd-wiki-hive / 'wiki-net': talk the rss-feed for the talk in the 'wiki-net'
    [en]

    conglomeration of intelligence

    MattisManzel:
    Imagine the wiki-net worked, imagine a bit into the future, please. Every wiki-community cares for their wiki-net pages, every page wiki-net draws a picture of the current neighborhood relations and interests of a wiki-community.
    AlexSchroeder said “wikis are nomads”. I agree. Currently moving a wiki from one hive to another - because the wiki has more ties and friends in the hive it moves to and thus “feels better” for example - is a pain in the … Imagine it wouldn’t. Just imagine.
    If so then couldn’t one write some code voodoo that analyses the wiki-nets of the wikis in the one big soup and figures out dynamically what wikis have the most ties to each other and - automatically - groups these wikis together in a hive? Automigration, kind of. Optimal grouping together wikis based on the information on the page wiki-net of every wiki. Conglomeration of intelligence. …
    Or, probably better, not caring on what server (hives are currently server based) wikis run on at all and composing a “hive” = a temporary togetherness from wikis running on different servers. “Hive” as a mere idea, not as a physical fact anymore.

    Or both?

    Ok, just had to pin that down, cu.


  • 11:54 UTC Talk

    odd-wiki-hive / 'wiki-net'

    odd-wiki-hive / 'wiki-net': talk the rss-feed for the talk in the 'wiki-net'
    [en]

    conglomeration of intelligence

    MattisManzel:
    Imagine the wiki-net worked, imagine a bit into the future, please. Every wiki-community cares for their wiki-net pages, every page wiki-net draws a picture of the current neighborhood relations and interests of a wiki-community.
    AlexSchroeder said “wikis are nomads”. I agree. Currently moving a wiki from one hive to another - because the wiki has more ties and friends in the hive it moves to and thus “feels better” for example - is a pain in the … Imagine it wouldn’t. Just imagine.
    If so then couldn’t one write some code voodoo that analyses the wiki-nets of the wikis in the one big soup and figures out dynamically what wikis have the most ties to each other and - automatically - groups these wikis together in a hive? Automigration, kind of. Optimal grouping together wikis based on the information on the page wiki-net of every wiki. Conglomeration of intelligence. …
    Or, probably better, not caring on what server (hives are currently server based) wikis run on at all and composing a “hive” = a temporary togetherness from wikis running on different servers. “Hive” as a mere idea, not as a physical fact anymore.

    Or both?

    Ok, just had to pin that down, cu.


  • 11:54 UTC Talk

    odd-wiki-hive / 'wiki-net'

    odd-wiki-hive / 'wiki-net': talk the rss-feed for the talk in the 'wiki-net'
    [en]

    conglomeration of intelligence

    MattisManzel:
    Imagine the wiki-net worked, imagine a bit into the future, please. Every wiki-community cares for their wiki-net pages, every page wiki-net draws a picture of the current neighborhood relations and interests of a wiki-community.
    AlexSchroeder said “wikis are nomads”. I agree. Currently moving a wiki from one hive to another - because the wiki has more ties and friends in the hive it moves to and thus “feels better” for example - is a pain in the … Imagine it wouldn’t. Just imagine.
    If so then couldn’t one write some code voodoo that analyses the wiki-nets of the wikis in the one big soup and figures out dynamically what wikis have the most ties to each other and - automatically - groups these wikis together in a hive? Automigration, kind of. Optimal grouping together wikis based on the information on the page wiki-net of every wiki. Conglomeration of intelligence. …
    Or, probably better, not caring on what server (hives are currently server based) wikis run on at all and composing a “hive” = a temporary togetherness from wikis running on different servers. “Hive” as a mere idea, not as a physical fact anymore.

    Or both?

    Ok, just had to pin that down, cu.


  • 11:54 UTC Talk

    odd-wiki-hive / 'wiki-net'

    odd-wiki-hive / 'wiki-net': talk the rss-feed for the talk in the 'wiki-net'
    [en]

    conglomeration of intelligence

    MattisManzel:
    Imagine the wiki-net worked, imagine a bit into the future, please. Every wiki-community cares for their wiki-net pages, every page wiki-net draws a picture of the current neighborhood relations and interests of a wiki-community.
    AlexSchroeder said “wikis are nomads”. I agree. Currently moving a wiki from one hive to another - because the wiki has more ties and friends in the hive it moves to and thus “feels better” for example - is a pain in the … Imagine it wouldn’t. Just imagine.
    If so then couldn’t one write some code voodoo that analyses the wiki-nets of the wikis in the one big soup and figures out dynamically what wikis have the most ties to each other and - automatically - groups these wikis together in a hive? Automigration, kind of. Optimal grouping together wikis based on the information on the page wiki-net of every wiki. Conglomeration of intelligence. …
    Or, probably better, not caring on what server (hives are currently server based) wikis run on at all and composing a “hive” = a temporary togetherness from wikis running on different servers. “Hive” as a mere idea, not as a physical fact anymore.

    Or both?

    Ok, just had to pin that down, cu.


2008-09-17

2008-09-13

  • 08:07 UTC Talk

    odd-wiki-hive / odd-wiki-center-en

    odd-wiki-hive / odd-wiki-center-en: talk the rss-feed for the talk in the odd-wiki-center-en
    [en]

    MattisManzel:
    Alex, good morning new-years. I miss some early, not very elaborated wikistubs, they seem to be gone, likely not edited for half a year. Such happens, no problem. Just wanted to ask if they’re really gone. RopeWiki? BordersWorkerUnited? DevX? … etc.

    Do I have to major edit to make a wiki stay or is a minor edit sufficient?


  • 08:07 UTC Talk

    odd-wiki-hive / odd-wiki-center-en

    odd-wiki-hive / odd-wiki-center-en: talk the rss-feed for the talk in the odd-wiki-center-en
    [en]

    MattisManzel:
    Alex, good morning new-years. I miss some early, not very elaborated wikistubs, they seem to be gone, likely not edited for half a year. Such happens, no problem. Just wanted to ask if they’re really gone. RopeWiki? BordersWorkerUnited? DevX? … etc.

    Do I have to major edit to make a wiki stay or is a minor edit sufficient?


  • 08:07 UTC Talk

    odd-wiki-hive / odd-wiki-center-en

    odd-wiki-hive / odd-wiki-center-en: talk the rss-feed for the talk in the odd-wiki-center-en
    [en]

    MattisManzel:
    Alex, good morning new-years. I miss some early, not very elaborated wikistubs, they seem to be gone, likely not edited for half a year. Such happens, no problem. Just wanted to ask if they’re really gone. RopeWiki? BordersWorkerUnited? DevX? … etc.

    Do I have to major edit to make a wiki stay or is a minor edit sufficient?


  • 08:07 UTC Talk

    odd-wiki-hive / odd-wiki-center-en

    odd-wiki-hive / odd-wiki-center-en: talk the rss-feed for the talk in the odd-wiki-center-en
    [en]

    MattisManzel:
    Alex, good morning new-years. I miss some early, not very elaborated wikistubs, they seem to be gone, likely not edited for half a year. Such happens, no problem. Just wanted to ask if they’re really gone. RopeWiki? BordersWorkerUnited? DevX? … etc.

    Do I have to major edit to make a wiki stay or is a minor edit sufficient?


  • 08:07 UTC Talk

    odd-wiki-hive / odd-wiki-center-en

    odd-wiki-hive / odd-wiki-center-en: talk the rss-feed for the talk in the odd-wiki-center-en
    [en]

    MattisManzel:
    Alex, good morning new-years. I miss some early, not very elaborated wikistubs, they seem to be gone, likely not edited for half a year. Such happens, no problem. Just wanted to ask if they’re really gone. RopeWiki? BordersWorkerUnited? DevX? … etc.

    Do I have to major edit to make a wiki stay or is a minor edit sufficient?


  • 08:07 UTC Talk

    odd-wiki-hive / odd-wiki-center-en

    odd-wiki-hive / odd-wiki-center-en: talk the rss-feed for the talk in the odd-wiki-center-en
    [en]

    MattisManzel:
    Alex, good morning new-years. I miss some early, not very elaborated wikistubs, they seem to be gone, likely not edited for half a year. Such happens, no problem. Just wanted to ask if they’re really gone. RopeWiki? BordersWorkerUnited? DevX? … etc.

    Do I have to major edit to make a wiki stay or is a minor edit sufficient?


  • 08:07 UTC Talk

    odd-wiki-hive / odd-wiki-center-en

    odd-wiki-hive / odd-wiki-center-en: talk the rss-feed for the talk in the odd-wiki-center-en
    [en]

    MattisManzel:
    Alex, good morning new-years. I miss some early, not very elaborated wikistubs, they seem to be gone, likely not edited for half a year. Such happens, no problem. Just wanted to ask if they’re really gone. RopeWiki? BordersWorkerUnited? DevX? … etc.

    Do I have to major edit to make a wiki stay or is a minor edit sufficient?


  • 08:07 UTC Talk

    odd-wiki-hive / odd-wiki-center-en

    odd-wiki-hive / odd-wiki-center-en: talk the rss-feed for the talk in the odd-wiki-center-en
    [en]

    MattisManzel:
    Alex, good morning new-years. I miss some early, not very elaborated wikistubs, they seem to be gone, likely not edited for half a year. Such happens, no problem. Just wanted to ask if they’re really gone. RopeWiki? BordersWorkerUnited? DevX? … etc.

    Do I have to major edit to make a wiki stay or is a minor edit sufficient?


  • 08:07 UTC Talk

    odd-wiki-hive / odd-wiki-center-en

    odd-wiki-hive / odd-wiki-center-en: talk the rss-feed for the talk in the odd-wiki-center-en
    [en]

    MattisManzel:
    Alex, good morning new-years. I miss some early, not very elaborated wikistubs, they seem to be gone, likely not edited for half a year. Such happens, no problem. Just wanted to ask if they’re really gone. RopeWiki? BordersWorkerUnited? DevX? … etc.

    Do I have to major edit to make a wiki stay or is a minor edit sufficient?


  • 08:07 UTC Talk

    odd-wiki-hive / odd-wiki-center-en

    odd-wiki-hive / odd-wiki-center-en: talk the rss-feed for the talk in the odd-wiki-center-en
    [en]

    MattisManzel:
    Alex, good morning new-years. I miss some early, not very elaborated wikistubs, they seem to be gone, likely not edited for half a year. Such happens, no problem. Just wanted to ask if they’re really gone. RopeWiki? BordersWorkerUnited? DevX? … etc.

    Do I have to major edit to make a wiki stay or is a minor edit sufficient?


  • 08:07 UTC Talk

    odd-wiki-hive / odd-wiki-center-en

    odd-wiki-hive / odd-wiki-center-en: talk the rss-feed for the talk in the odd-wiki-center-en
    [en]

    MattisManzel:
    Alex, good morning new-years. I miss some early, not very elaborated wikistubs, they seem to be gone, likely not edited for half a year. Such happens, no problem. Just wanted to ask if they’re really gone. RopeWiki? BordersWorkerUnited? DevX? … etc.

    Do I have to major edit to make a wiki stay or is a minor edit sufficient?


  • 08:07 UTC Talk

    odd-wiki-hive / odd-wiki-center-en

    odd-wiki-hive / odd-wiki-center-en: talk the rss-feed for the talk in the odd-wiki-center-en
    [en]

    MattisManzel:
    Alex, good morning new-years. I miss some early, not very elaborated wikistubs, they seem to be gone, likely not edited for half a year. Such happens, no problem. Just wanted to ask if they’re really gone. RopeWiki? BordersWorkerUnited? DevX? … etc.

    Do I have to major edit to make a wiki stay or is a minor edit sufficient?


2008-09-09


This page includes the recent talk in the wikis in the odd-wiki-hive. For a complete history click soup group: odd-wiki all talk and scroll to the end.