The talk in all wikis in the odd-wiki-hive
This page contains an inclusion of the soup group: odd-wiki all talk which in turn is composed of the talk-feeds of all wikis in the odd-wiki-hive. Please keep the soup group manually synchronized with the hive-list.
The alternative page [AllTalkInTheHiveDirectly? all talk in the hive, directly] includes the talk-feeds of the odd-wikis directly without using soup.io and takes longer to load. Patience, please.
This page does not automatically refresh when a day-page “talk” included into it from an odd-wiki has been changed. Please force a refresh (Firefox: shift + click reload).
Currently included into this page:
Click a number [n] to read aggregated information about a obm-wiki.
2008-09-18

conglomeration of intelligence
MattisManzel:
Imagine the wiki-net worked, imagine a bit into the future, please. Every wiki-community cares for their wiki-net pages, every page wiki-net draws a picture of the current neighborhood relations and interests of a wiki-community.
AlexSchroeder said “wikis are nomads”. I agree. Currently moving a wiki from one hive to another - because the wiki has more ties and friends in the hive it moves to and thus “feels better” for example - is a pain in the … Imagine it wouldn’t. Just imagine.
If so then couldn’t one write some code voodoo that analyses the wiki-nets of the wikis in the one big soup and figures out dynamically what wikis have the most ties to each other and - automatically - groups these wikis together in a hive? Automigration, kind of. Optimal grouping together wikis based on the information on the page wiki-net of every wiki. Conglomeration of intelligence. …
Or, probably better, not caring on what server (hives are currently server based) wikis run on at all and composing a “hive” = a temporary togetherness from wikis running on different servers. “Hive” as a mere idea, not as a physical fact anymore.
Ok, just had to pin that down, cu.

conglomeration of intelligence
MattisManzel:
Imagine the wiki-net worked, imagine a bit into the future, please. Every wiki-community cares for their wiki-net pages, every page wiki-net draws a picture of the current neighborhood relations and interests of a wiki-community.
AlexSchroeder said “wikis are nomads”. I agree. Currently moving a wiki from one hive to another - because the wiki has more ties and friends in the hive it moves to and thus “feels better” for example - is a pain in the … Imagine it wouldn’t. Just imagine.
If so then couldn’t one write some code voodoo that analyses the wiki-nets of the wikis in the one big soup and figures out dynamically what wikis have the most ties to each other and - automatically - groups these wikis together in a hive? Automigration, kind of. Optimal grouping together wikis based on the information on the page wiki-net of every wiki. Conglomeration of intelligence. …
Or, probably better, not caring on what server (hives are currently server based) wikis run on at all and composing a “hive” = a temporary togetherness from wikis running on different servers. “Hive” as a mere idea, not as a physical fact anymore.
Ok, just had to pin that down, cu.

conglomeration of intelligence
MattisManzel:
Imagine the wiki-net worked, imagine a bit into the future, please. Every wiki-community cares for their wiki-net pages, every page wiki-net draws a picture of the current neighborhood relations and interests of a wiki-community.
AlexSchroeder said “wikis are nomads”. I agree. Currently moving a wiki from one hive to another - because the wiki has more ties and friends in the hive it moves to and thus “feels better” for example - is a pain in the … Imagine it wouldn’t. Just imagine.
If so then couldn’t one write some code voodoo that analyses the wiki-nets of the wikis in the one big soup and figures out dynamically what wikis have the most ties to each other and - automatically - groups these wikis together in a hive? Automigration, kind of. Optimal grouping together wikis based on the information on the page wiki-net of every wiki. Conglomeration of intelligence. …
Or, probably better, not caring on what server (hives are currently server based) wikis run on at all and composing a “hive” = a temporary togetherness from wikis running on different servers. “Hive” as a mere idea, not as a physical fact anymore.
Ok, just had to pin that down, cu.

conglomeration of intelligence
MattisManzel:
Imagine the wiki-net worked, imagine a bit into the future, please. Every wiki-community cares for their wiki-net pages, every page wiki-net draws a picture of the current neighborhood relations and interests of a wiki-community.
AlexSchroeder said “wikis are nomads”. I agree. Currently moving a wiki from one hive to another - because the wiki has more ties and friends in the hive it moves to and thus “feels better” for example - is a pain in the … Imagine it wouldn’t. Just imagine.
If so then couldn’t one write some code voodoo that analyses the wiki-nets of the wikis in the one big soup and figures out dynamically what wikis have the most ties to each other and - automatically - groups these wikis together in a hive? Automigration, kind of. Optimal grouping together wikis based on the information on the page wiki-net of every wiki. Conglomeration of intelligence. …
Or, probably better, not caring on what server (hives are currently server based) wikis run on at all and composing a “hive” = a temporary togetherness from wikis running on different servers. “Hive” as a mere idea, not as a physical fact anymore.
Ok, just had to pin that down, cu.

conglomeration of intelligence
MattisManzel:
Imagine the wiki-net worked, imagine a bit into the future, please. Every wiki-community cares for their wiki-net pages, every page wiki-net draws a picture of the current neighborhood relations and interests of a wiki-community.
AlexSchroeder said “wikis are nomads”. I agree. Currently moving a wiki from one hive to another - because the wiki has more ties and friends in the hive it moves to and thus “feels better” for example - is a pain in the … Imagine it wouldn’t. Just imagine.
If so then couldn’t one write some code voodoo that analyses the wiki-nets of the wikis in the one big soup and figures out dynamically what wikis have the most ties to each other and - automatically - groups these wikis together in a hive? Automigration, kind of. Optimal grouping together wikis based on the information on the page wiki-net of every wiki. Conglomeration of intelligence. …
Or, probably better, not caring on what server (hives are currently server based) wikis run on at all and composing a “hive” = a temporary togetherness from wikis running on different servers. “Hive” as a mere idea, not as a physical fact anymore.
Ok, just had to pin that down, cu.

conglomeration of intelligence
MattisManzel:
Imagine the wiki-net worked, imagine a bit into the future, please. Every wiki-community cares for their wiki-net pages, every page wiki-net draws a picture of the current neighborhood relations and interests of a wiki-community.
AlexSchroeder said “wikis are nomads”. I agree. Currently moving a wiki from one hive to another - because the wiki has more ties and friends in the hive it moves to and thus “feels better” for example - is a pain in the … Imagine it wouldn’t. Just imagine.
If so then couldn’t one write some code voodoo that analyses the wiki-nets of the wikis in the one big soup and figures out dynamically what wikis have the most ties to each other and - automatically - groups these wikis together in a hive? Automigration, kind of. Optimal grouping together wikis based on the information on the page wiki-net of every wiki. Conglomeration of intelligence. …
Or, probably better, not caring on what server (hives are currently server based) wikis run on at all and composing a “hive” = a temporary togetherness from wikis running on different servers. “Hive” as a mere idea, not as a physical fact anymore.
Ok, just had to pin that down, cu.

conglomeration of intelligence
MattisManzel:
Imagine the wiki-net worked, imagine a bit into the future, please. Every wiki-community cares for their wiki-net pages, every page wiki-net draws a picture of the current neighborhood relations and interests of a wiki-community.
AlexSchroeder said “wikis are nomads”. I agree. Currently moving a wiki from one hive to another - because the wiki has more ties and friends in the hive it moves to and thus “feels better” for example - is a pain in the … Imagine it wouldn’t. Just imagine.
If so then couldn’t one write some code voodoo that analyses the wiki-nets of the wikis in the one big soup and figures out dynamically what wikis have the most ties to each other and - automatically - groups these wikis together in a hive? Automigration, kind of. Optimal grouping together wikis based on the information on the page wiki-net of every wiki. Conglomeration of intelligence. …
Or, probably better, not caring on what server (hives are currently server based) wikis run on at all and composing a “hive” = a temporary togetherness from wikis running on different servers. “Hive” as a mere idea, not as a physical fact anymore.
Ok, just had to pin that down, cu.

conglomeration of intelligence
MattisManzel:
Imagine the wiki-net worked, imagine a bit into the future, please. Every wiki-community cares for their wiki-net pages, every page wiki-net draws a picture of the current neighborhood relations and interests of a wiki-community.
AlexSchroeder said “wikis are nomads”. I agree. Currently moving a wiki from one hive to another - because the wiki has more ties and friends in the hive it moves to and thus “feels better” for example - is a pain in the … Imagine it wouldn’t. Just imagine.
If so then couldn’t one write some code voodoo that analyses the wiki-nets of the wikis in the one big soup and figures out dynamically what wikis have the most ties to each other and - automatically - groups these wikis together in a hive? Automigration, kind of. Optimal grouping together wikis based on the information on the page wiki-net of every wiki. Conglomeration of intelligence. …
Or, probably better, not caring on what server (hives are currently server based) wikis run on at all and composing a “hive” = a temporary togetherness from wikis running on different servers. “Hive” as a mere idea, not as a physical fact anymore.
Ok, just had to pin that down, cu.

conglomeration of intelligence
MattisManzel:
Imagine the wiki-net worked, imagine a bit into the future, please. Every wiki-community cares for their wiki-net pages, every page wiki-net draws a picture of the current neighborhood relations and interests of a wiki-community.
AlexSchroeder said “wikis are nomads”. I agree. Currently moving a wiki from one hive to another - because the wiki has more ties and friends in the hive it moves to and thus “feels better” for example - is a pain in the … Imagine it wouldn’t. Just imagine.
If so then couldn’t one write some code voodoo that analyses the wiki-nets of the wikis in the one big soup and figures out dynamically what wikis have the most ties to each other and - automatically - groups these wikis together in a hive? Automigration, kind of. Optimal grouping together wikis based on the information on the page wiki-net of every wiki. Conglomeration of intelligence. …
Or, probably better, not caring on what server (hives are currently server based) wikis run on at all and composing a “hive” = a temporary togetherness from wikis running on different servers. “Hive” as a mere idea, not as a physical fact anymore.
Ok, just had to pin that down, cu.

conglomeration of intelligence
MattisManzel:
Imagine the wiki-net worked, imagine a bit into the future, please. Every wiki-community cares for their wiki-net pages, every page wiki-net draws a picture of the current neighborhood relations and interests of a wiki-community.
AlexSchroeder said “wikis are nomads”. I agree. Currently moving a wiki from one hive to another - because the wiki has more ties and friends in the hive it moves to and thus “feels better” for example - is a pain in the … Imagine it wouldn’t. Just imagine.
If so then couldn’t one write some code voodoo that analyses the wiki-nets of the wikis in the one big soup and figures out dynamically what wikis have the most ties to each other and - automatically - groups these wikis together in a hive? Automigration, kind of. Optimal grouping together wikis based on the information on the page wiki-net of every wiki. Conglomeration of intelligence. …
Or, probably better, not caring on what server (hives are currently server based) wikis run on at all and composing a “hive” = a temporary togetherness from wikis running on different servers. “Hive” as a mere idea, not as a physical fact anymore.
Ok, just had to pin that down, cu.

conglomeration of intelligence
MattisManzel:
Imagine the wiki-net worked, imagine a bit into the future, please. Every wiki-community cares for their wiki-net pages, every page wiki-net draws a picture of the current neighborhood relations and interests of a wiki-community.
AlexSchroeder said “wikis are nomads”. I agree. Currently moving a wiki from one hive to another - because the wiki has more ties and friends in the hive it moves to and thus “feels better” for example - is a pain in the … Imagine it wouldn’t. Just imagine.
If so then couldn’t one write some code voodoo that analyses the wiki-nets of the wikis in the one big soup and figures out dynamically what wikis have the most ties to each other and - automatically - groups these wikis together in a hive? Automigration, kind of. Optimal grouping together wikis based on the information on the page wiki-net of every wiki. Conglomeration of intelligence. …
Or, probably better, not caring on what server (hives are currently server based) wikis run on at all and composing a “hive” = a temporary togetherness from wikis running on different servers. “Hive” as a mere idea, not as a physical fact anymore.
Ok, just had to pin that down, cu.
2008-09-17

via soup.io or directly
MattisManzel:
On all faces in the hive I’m trying out another way to aggregate all faces in the odd-wiki-hive using the soup group odd-wiki all faces. Advantage to the page all face in the hive, directly is: loads faster, can be used to create kabo-wiki-hive / whoRthey-wiki: one big face. Disadvantage is: first level links go to soup.io pages instead of the wiki-pages, the refresh delay is longer.
No idea yet if the soup.io inclusion still needs the page refresh to update. It would be nice if not. 

via soup.io or directly
MattisManzel:
On all faces in the hive I’m trying out another way to aggregate all faces in the odd-wiki-hive using the soup group odd-wiki all faces. Advantage to the page all face in the hive, directly is: loads faster, can be used to create kabo-wiki-hive / whoRthey-wiki: one big face. Disadvantage is: first level links go to soup.io pages instead of the wiki-pages, the refresh delay is longer.
No idea yet if the soup.io inclusion still needs the page refresh to update. It would be nice if not. 

via soup.io or directly
MattisManzel:
On all faces in the hive I’m trying out another way to aggregate all faces in the odd-wiki-hive using the soup group odd-wiki all faces. Advantage to the page all face in the hive, directly is: loads faster, can be used to create kabo-wiki-hive / whoRthey-wiki: one big face. Disadvantage is: first level links go to soup.io pages instead of the wiki-pages, the refresh delay is longer.
No idea yet if the soup.io inclusion still needs the page refresh to update. It would be nice if not. 

via soup.io or directly
MattisManzel:
On all faces in the hive I’m trying out another way to aggregate all faces in the odd-wiki-hive using the soup group odd-wiki all faces. Advantage to the page all face in the hive, directly is: loads faster, can be used to create kabo-wiki-hive / whoRthey-wiki: one big face. Disadvantage is: first level links go to soup.io pages instead of the wiki-pages, the refresh delay is longer.
No idea yet if the soup.io inclusion still needs the page refresh to update. It would be nice if not. 

via soup.io or directly
MattisManzel:
On all faces in the hive I’m trying out another way to aggregate all faces in the odd-wiki-hive using the soup group odd-wiki all faces. Advantage to the page all face in the hive, directly is: loads faster, can be used to create kabo-wiki-hive / whoRthey-wiki: one big face. Disadvantage is: first level links go to soup.io pages instead of the wiki-pages, the refresh delay is longer.
No idea yet if the soup.io inclusion still needs the page refresh to update. It would be nice if not. 

via soup.io or directly
MattisManzel:
On all faces in the hive I’m trying out another way to aggregate all faces in the odd-wiki-hive using the soup group odd-wiki all faces. Advantage to the page all face in the hive, directly is: loads faster, can be used to create kabo-wiki-hive / whoRthey-wiki: one big face. Disadvantage is: first level links go to soup.io pages instead of the wiki-pages, the refresh delay is longer.
No idea yet if the soup.io inclusion still needs the page refresh to update. It would be nice if not. 

via soup.io or directly
MattisManzel:
On all faces in the hive I’m trying out another way to aggregate all faces in the odd-wiki-hive using the soup group odd-wiki all faces. Advantage to the page all face in the hive, directly is: loads faster, can be used to create kabo-wiki-hive / whoRthey-wiki: one big face. Disadvantage is: first level links go to soup.io pages instead of the wiki-pages, the refresh delay is longer.
No idea yet if the soup.io inclusion still needs the page refresh to update. It would be nice if not. 

via soup.io or directly
MattisManzel:
On all faces in the hive I’m trying out another way to aggregate all faces in the odd-wiki-hive using the soup group odd-wiki all faces. Advantage to the page all face in the hive, directly is: loads faster, can be used to create kabo-wiki-hive / whoRthey-wiki: one big face. Disadvantage is: first level links go to soup.io pages instead of the wiki-pages, the refresh delay is longer.
No idea yet if the soup.io inclusion still needs the page refresh to update. It would be nice if not. 

via soup.io or directly
MattisManzel:
On all faces in the hive I’m trying out another way to aggregate all faces in the odd-wiki-hive using the soup group odd-wiki all faces. Advantage to the page all face in the hive, directly is: loads faster, can be used to create kabo-wiki-hive / whoRthey-wiki: one big face. Disadvantage is: first level links go to soup.io pages instead of the wiki-pages, the refresh delay is longer.
No idea yet if the soup.io inclusion still needs the page refresh to update. It would be nice if not. 

via soup.io or directly
MattisManzel:
On all faces in the hive I’m trying out another way to aggregate all faces in the odd-wiki-hive using the soup group odd-wiki all faces. Advantage to the page all face in the hive, directly is: loads faster, can be used to create kabo-wiki-hive / whoRthey-wiki: one big face. Disadvantage is: first level links go to soup.io pages instead of the wiki-pages, the refresh delay is longer.
No idea yet if the soup.io inclusion still needs the page refresh to update. It would be nice if not. 

via soup.io or directly
MattisManzel:
On all faces in the hive I’m trying out another way to aggregate all faces in the odd-wiki-hive using the soup group odd-wiki all faces. Advantage to the page all face in the hive, directly is: loads faster, can be used to create kabo-wiki-hive / whoRthey-wiki: one big face. Disadvantage is: first level links go to soup.io pages instead of the wiki-pages, the refresh delay is longer.
No idea yet if the soup.io inclusion still needs the page refresh to update. It would be nice if not. 
2008-09-13

MattisManzel:
Alex, good morning new-years. I miss some early, not very elaborated wikistubs, they seem to be gone, likely not edited for half a year. Such happens, no problem. Just wanted to ask if they’re really gone. RopeWiki? BordersWorkerUnited? DevX? … etc.
Do I have to major edit to make a wiki stay or is a minor edit sufficient?

MattisManzel:
Alex, good morning new-years. I miss some early, not very elaborated wikistubs, they seem to be gone, likely not edited for half a year. Such happens, no problem. Just wanted to ask if they’re really gone. RopeWiki? BordersWorkerUnited? DevX? … etc.
Do I have to major edit to make a wiki stay or is a minor edit sufficient?

MattisManzel:
Alex, good morning new-years. I miss some early, not very elaborated wikistubs, they seem to be gone, likely not edited for half a year. Such happens, no problem. Just wanted to ask if they’re really gone. RopeWiki? BordersWorkerUnited? DevX? … etc.
Do I have to major edit to make a wiki stay or is a minor edit sufficient?

MattisManzel:
Alex, good morning new-years. I miss some early, not very elaborated wikistubs, they seem to be gone, likely not edited for half a year. Such happens, no problem. Just wanted to ask if they’re really gone. RopeWiki? BordersWorkerUnited? DevX? … etc.
Do I have to major edit to make a wiki stay or is a minor edit sufficient?

MattisManzel:
Alex, good morning new-years. I miss some early, not very elaborated wikistubs, they seem to be gone, likely not edited for half a year. Such happens, no problem. Just wanted to ask if they’re really gone. RopeWiki? BordersWorkerUnited? DevX? … etc.
Do I have to major edit to make a wiki stay or is a minor edit sufficient?

MattisManzel:
Alex, good morning new-years. I miss some early, not very elaborated wikistubs, they seem to be gone, likely not edited for half a year. Such happens, no problem. Just wanted to ask if they’re really gone. RopeWiki? BordersWorkerUnited? DevX? … etc.
Do I have to major edit to make a wiki stay or is a minor edit sufficient?

MattisManzel:
Alex, good morning new-years. I miss some early, not very elaborated wikistubs, they seem to be gone, likely not edited for half a year. Such happens, no problem. Just wanted to ask if they’re really gone. RopeWiki? BordersWorkerUnited? DevX? … etc.
Do I have to major edit to make a wiki stay or is a minor edit sufficient?

MattisManzel:
Alex, good morning new-years. I miss some early, not very elaborated wikistubs, they seem to be gone, likely not edited for half a year. Such happens, no problem. Just wanted to ask if they’re really gone. RopeWiki? BordersWorkerUnited? DevX? … etc.
Do I have to major edit to make a wiki stay or is a minor edit sufficient?

MattisManzel:
Alex, good morning new-years. I miss some early, not very elaborated wikistubs, they seem to be gone, likely not edited for half a year. Such happens, no problem. Just wanted to ask if they’re really gone. RopeWiki? BordersWorkerUnited? DevX? … etc.
Do I have to major edit to make a wiki stay or is a minor edit sufficient?

MattisManzel:
Alex, good morning new-years. I miss some early, not very elaborated wikistubs, they seem to be gone, likely not edited for half a year. Such happens, no problem. Just wanted to ask if they’re really gone. RopeWiki? BordersWorkerUnited? DevX? … etc.
Do I have to major edit to make a wiki stay or is a minor edit sufficient?

MattisManzel:
Alex, good morning new-years. I miss some early, not very elaborated wikistubs, they seem to be gone, likely not edited for half a year. Such happens, no problem. Just wanted to ask if they’re really gone. RopeWiki? BordersWorkerUnited? DevX? … etc.
Do I have to major edit to make a wiki stay or is a minor edit sufficient?

MattisManzel:
Alex, good morning new-years. I miss some early, not very elaborated wikistubs, they seem to be gone, likely not edited for half a year. Such happens, no problem. Just wanted to ask if they’re really gone. RopeWiki? BordersWorkerUnited? DevX? … etc.
Do I have to major edit to make a wiki stay or is a minor edit sufficient?
2008-09-09

new wiki-net icon
MattisManzel:
The wiki-net icon oddyssey (deliberate double d). Now we have the mascot of the net as an icon.
Thanks to RadomirDopieralski for the essential spider idea and the art work. ‘em spiders’ll soon be all over.
This is awesome - MarkDilley

new wiki-net icon
MattisManzel:
The wiki-net icon oddyssey (deliberate double d). Now we have the mascot of the net as an icon.
Thanks to RadomirDopieralski for the essential spider idea and the art work. ‘em spiders’ll soon be all over.
This is awesome - MarkDilley

new wiki-net icon
MattisManzel:
The wiki-net icon oddyssey (deliberate double d). Now we have the mascot of the net as an icon.
Thanks to RadomirDopieralski for the essential spider idea and the art work. ‘em spiders’ll soon be all over.
This is awesome - MarkDilley

new wiki-net icon
MattisManzel:
The wiki-net icon oddyssey (deliberate double d). Now we have the mascot of the net as an icon.
Thanks to RadomirDopieralski for the essential spider idea and the art work. ‘em spiders’ll soon be all over.
This is awesome - MarkDilley

new wiki-net icon
MattisManzel:
The wiki-net icon oddyssey (deliberate double d). Now we have the mascot of the net as an icon.
Thanks to RadomirDopieralski for the essential spider idea and the art work. ‘em spiders’ll soon be all over.
This is awesome - MarkDilley

new wiki-net icon
MattisManzel:
The wiki-net icon oddyssey (deliberate double d). Now we have the mascot of the net as an icon.
Thanks to RadomirDopieralski for the essential spider idea and the art work. ‘em spiders’ll soon be all over.
This is awesome - MarkDilley
This page includes the recent talk in the wikis in the odd-wiki-hive. For a complete history click soup group: odd-wiki all talk and scroll to the end.