The day-page-set for the talk in the lady-wiki
Read without preceding explanations.
To edit click edit the day-page "talk" for today.
Alternatively click a day in the talk-calendar or click the green title of a day-page “talk” included below to open a day-page. If it isn’t already in edit-mode click “
edit this page” to the upper right. What is a day-page?
The talk-calendar
The talk / wider calendar provides a wider view. The full calendar gives access to all day-pages.
October 2008 Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
November 2008 Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
December 2008 Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
The talk-feed is not in use. Day-pages “talk” are not included into other web-sites. The talk is “private”.
the lady-wiki has been updated to the recent wiki-net development
MattisManzel:
I updated to the recent wiki-net development.
MattisManzel:
Someone put a link to the Women's Studies Department into the side bar of the oddwiki-hive. Fits better here, I guess. I moved it. Should go to the wiki-node if some interaction arises.
Where’s the man-wiki? 
MattisManzel:
Well, Startup, click go. Maybe a good idea, even: man-wiki, guy-wiki, male-mammal-wiki? Have an elegant name for it? We should try, I think. It costs nothing.
It’s a while ago, May 06, when I was wandering wikilandia as I use to do sometimes. And I dropped on ladywiki.org, a completely spammed down wiki, broken history, irreparable. There was some little chat on it, not much. Most of all it had the lady-wiki-girl on the FrontPage - and I fell in love with her immediately. It turned out that Tim, a friend of mine from Gründerwiki had registered the domain, an old project of his he didn’t want to care for anymore. So I set it up. I was in a wiki-making mood then anyhow. Can’t hurt, can it?
I stretched the logo to 740 pixel width which made it even more lady-like.
We can insert the wiki-fairy here, for some graphics. Maybe the ladies like some graphics? You never know. They sometimes like good-looking things like flowers and such. They always decide for themselves.
Maybe man-2.0-wiki? I’d be interested to find out what that is. I’m male myself. Not Version 2.0, that’s for sure. It’s hard to tell for yourself. Are you 0.9.1, are you 1.1 or even 1.5 rc2?
I mean, is there a better place than an entirely virgin lady-wiki for the man-2.0-wiki to be created from? Like Adam being created from a rib of Eve?
Let’s better hurry a bit to get that done before the ladies fly in here. What you think?
Tim called it genderkiller wiki. I like that. His original phrasing for the idea of the lady-wiki was more general, I reduced it to female, to ladies-issues, thinking that women probably would like a wiki for themselves. With man-2.0-wiki the lady-wiki turns into woman-2.0-wiki - we could include each others faces on the pages wiki-net faces so none of them feels terribly alone anymore. That’s a point about man(-wiki) and woman(-wiki). They feel terribly alone without each other often. And it’s just a little symbolic link - no real mating
. Or maybe it even is real? Fertile wiki-sex? I’m getting carried away, sorry (to community-wiki: women and men and wiki where I go on).