There are serious risks:
If only a bit more than a tiny part of the conventional money, which is in circulating worldwide, would slip over into the new system - the consequences for the world economy could be disastrous. Therefore we need a brake for the growth of the total sum of Terra in the system. A brake however to limit the entry of new members is not necessary. This requires a further controller:
I would like the growth of the total sum of Terra in the world system to be slowed down:
maximal
not slowed down
If all members set their controllers to minus infinite no new Terra is credited anymore by conversion from conventional currencies. The system will still grow (because one single member sets his controller only to nearly minus infinite. The world system will always grow, believe me!). The absorption of growth though makes the system limit the possible amount for exchange of conventional currency to terra per unit of time. The system calculates this maximum amount continuously (this requires a further field in the program window: current absorption of growth of the system in dB?, in %? The current maximum amount for conversion is: xxx, x eT/ unit of time) The members decide on the extent of absorption and thus over the permitted maximum amount for exchange.
The system receives donated taxes. Its members decide how to use this money. They alone do, I can only submit suggestions here: - world-wide humanitarian donations, as it is good and its good for the public image as well. - commitment in the stock and financial market. The conventional structures must be penetrated, in order to weaken and be able to displace them. The world system will become a kind of company, which will finally “buy up” all other companies of the world . The world system will be probably founded as a regular enterprise, “World System Ltd.”, something like that. It will possibly go to the stock exchange and possibly will be extremely successful there. This would be good for the responsibility of its members. There is everything to win at any time, just as there is everything to lose.
By the way: a nice date for the abolishment of all conventional currencies and the declaration of the Terra as the only valid currency worldwide would be July 1st 2007, wouldn’t it? Maybe that’s a bit over-hurried. It might be even a sheer phantasm.
Existing structures, administration etc. must be reformed within the system. The whole story mainly causes a damn lot of work – which is for a good purpose however.
There is no limitation for the acceptation of new members to the system. The system must remain unrestrictedly efficient even in the case of extreme expansion. It must be appropriate for extreme expansion.
Many, many, who have little money, want to join in (e.g. half Africa) - this must be possible.
The Sheikhs of Arabia or the Colombian drug mafia want to join in and want to convert their fortune. They would thereby suddenly gain a lot of influence in the system (though possibly only after first having donated a lot of taxes). The members must be able to limit this by positioning their growth controllers. It will therefore possibly take quite some time, until superrich members exchanged a large fortune to Terra. The world system is open for all humans and all conventional money in the world. The world system will finally include all humans and all conventional money will be exchanged into it. Humans will decide that the conventional currencies should no be longer valid. Then the amount of money in the world will not only be known to everybody, but it will also be a constant amount. This is when peace on earth will have a chance – before this moment this chance will probably move closer, but it will not really exist yet.
Controller: Wealth
The maximum permitted individual possession of Terra is
Zero
infinite
For wealthy persons this surely is a puzzling controller. What happens to the possession of someone, who possesses more than the upper limit defined by the world community? Does the surplus amount automatically turn into a tax donation? Or does this controller only limit the power of the voice of money of superrich people, but not the possible personal possession itself? By the way: By means of this controller mankind could as well decide to make everybody completely equal. All members set their controller to 0,0 Terra. Then the world system alone would possess all money. All money would in a way belong to everybody. A conception quite welcome for the future. Certainly the consciousness of mankind has to change before such a step could be taken.
All these controller settings are obscure, the consequences when changing them are difficult to understand and hard to predict. A possible task for parties in the world system would be to make recommendations for the settings or to supply templates, the members can apply to their personal controller settings. It would be likewise conceivable to link settings dynamically. The parties react on changes. As a consequence certain (or all) controller settings specified by a member are changed automatically. Only a few will be constantly watching their screens. It is enough, if all are aware of the responsibility these settings represent. With these controllers each member is steering the world.
A picture (for potential pilots and flight simmers): The world as an aircraft, mankind as its pilot. A glider, well trimmed and in good straight forward flight continues its way steadfastly even in case the pilot takes his hand off the control stick. It is in stable equilibrium. A helicopter however requires constant correction, its equilibrium is unstable. If the pilot takes the hand off the control stick, the heli drops and crashes inevitably. For my picture - mankind as pilot – it seems, the world behaves similar to the helicopter. Everybody must constantly leave his hand on the control stick. Since however many have too little time to do so, parties must give assistance. Everyone can access his account at any time and make changes in it. Global electrical “switzerlandisation” with permanent popular vote (for those who need it more simple).
One thing asides: There may be people within the worldwide circle of this webpage’s` legibility, influential, maybe ruthless, perhaps even brutal people, who think I suggest no good here. Dear reader, please - for the present initial phase that you didn’t hear about this page in television yet – do me the favor and save in on your computer. You may do whatever you want with the files. I simply would feel better like this, `know? Just in case something should happen to the server you downloaded then from. One can never know whether the sky is going to drop on a servers head already the in next moment, can one? Menu file, save as …, thank you ; -)
The goal is to - initiate of a new phase in human evolution. This phase could be overtitled “peace on earth by collective intelligence”. - short circuiting the defect in human psyche (roughly marked out on the start page) by making mankind use a computer program with associated data bases and the world-wide data network for communication and for finding common decision. The behavior of this program is influenced dynamically by its members. In contrast to the group-related single human (e.g. a statesman) the program would be capable to provide a picture of global opinion. It would be strictly logic and statistic, it would be affected by the world community in the processing of the parameters it is based on.
The parameters processed and indicated by the program are:
the identity (login = the 1) the individual possession in Terra (T) the individual amount of taxes that were donated (T) the setting of the controller “power of money” (-10 - +10) the setting of the controller “which money is to have power” (-10 - +10) the setting of the controller “growth absorption” (minus infinite to 0)
in addition:
the current number of members in the world system the current number of log-ins
the current average possession of the members in Terra the current average possession of the logged-in members in Terra
for all parameters the system calculates process diagrams
The program records the development of all parameters and archives them. The files of this archive are accessible to everybody. This archive will become a protocol of human evolution. The understandings that are gained from its scientific analysis will become the most important basis for further human evolution. We will finally be able to apply science not only on the world but on ourselves.
There are two essential questions: - is it possible to write such a program (incl. the associated control of enormous data bases) and make it work with a sufficient performance to provide the necessary flexibly and security? - is it possible to find a reliable link of the Terra to the conventional currencies?
About the second question:
Money in the bag, money on the bank. Let’s assume this: (I am by the way naive and economics do not really interest me. Everyone, who knows better may therefore send me an email)
Let’s assume a gentle person from the bank-scenery provides a bank account where - on the long run - the total of all conventional money will be deposited on (07/01/07, conception for the deadline, remember?). This person should be inspired by the world system and have no intention to take the stored money for any other reason than (for the benediction of mankind) make the conventional currencies break down in a controlled way. A dope head junior of a Swiss banker family, which - for what unpleasant reasons ever – recently turned sole heir, and who, since he doesn’t really feel that great, wants to do something good. A stupid example.
Or - and this seems to be the more probable variation to me: The members of the system distribute the total amount on very many different single accounts. Many members “own” a portion of the parked-away conventional money on their conventional accounts, nobody however has access to this money. Access has the world system only.
Particularly in the second case the stored conventional money would be used by the banks to make business with it. This does not matter. The increasing transfer of monetary transaction to a system outside the conventional currencies will irreparably weaken the conventional currencies. From the outset the Terra will be decisively superior to them and for that reason it will make them break down. Controlling this break down is our very task. A new world will be developed. The conventional world will break down. We must enforce the development of our new world to an extreme degree and we have to stop the collapse of our old world as long as it takes us to make the new world function. If we do not succeed in doing so, it will be to our greatest disadvantage.
The nature of my idea are hope and confidence.
Many, many part time thinkers will get on my balls with their notorious pessimism:
Bad terrorists will be surprised that their supporters think my idea is so great that they do not want to terrorize along any longer!
And the hackers are getting in their shoes already. They all are waiting for such a task! Everyone of them is “Neo” (Matrix)! They will provoke a global programming battle, which will be won soon (to be exact in the first dusk of the new evolution phase “global peace from collective intelligence” announcing over the horizon). This battle will be won against the bad, bad, bad and against the bad. No virus is as strong as hope and confidence. Or, to say it even more simple: Either you believe this and seize the control stick or we tumble with the kerosene-stinking Monster and its whole stoned-to-the-incapability-of-taking-action crew towards the ground and strain in the moment of its impact (impact by the way is not the impact of your children or your children’s children. Impact means that you, dear reader, will strain) Sorry for my non-up-to-date honesty.
It shouldn’t arise the impression here that I wanted to lift the world out of its hinges. I would like to lift it controlled and briefly out of its hinges, in order to push two washers onto the hinge pins, and immediately let the world slip back again into its hinges. Done like this the worlds lower edge wouldn’t any longer scratch over the floor, when you open the door, `know? Therefore.
If one suggests and starts such an eREevolution, and I am about to do so, one should point out: Awkward procedure can have catastrophic consequences of inconceivable extent. This is to be avoided. Do it, and do it right immediately. This was my decision, after my idea had gently spoken given me headaches for some months. Which catastrophic consequences of inconceivable extent could it have, if I did not suggest and start such an eREvolution, I considered. The first case definitely seemed the smaller evil to me. Thus do it, and under no circumstances make any field tests with sharp ammunition. The first version of the program, which can be linked to real slam-hard conventional money must be “airworthy”, in order to torment the helicopter picture again.
Many structures already exist in our world which could be functional, if new-arranged within the world system. The United Nations for example developed from a spirit, which has congruence with my idea. From the very beginning on we have to make possible and promote the construction of such structures within the world system. The world system should quite offer the possibility to intelligent heads to gain power and prosperity within it. The world system is not against power. It is against the enmity against neighbors of the same species, a characteristic that homo unfortunately carries along since the times of cannibalism. Instead of shooting the mad dog, it now simply is put on a the chain. Zwack! - and the doggy is controllable. In our case it would be self-controlled. We are capable to do that.
Back to the surface of the program:
current individual account balance: x,x eT
current total volume of money in the world system: yyyy yyyy, y eT
individually donated taxes: z,z eT
total volume of donated taxes: zzzzz, z eT
expenditures of the world system: yyyy, y eT
current possession of the world system: xxxxx,x eT
The power of money?
no power (“communism”)
maximum power (“capitalism”)
Which money is to possess power?
the individual possession
the taxes donated individually to the system
Note: (this controller could become unnecessary or become unnecessary soon)
An assumption which perhaps is wrong: The average position of this controller will tend to individually donated taxes with increasing number of members and stabilization of the system. Absorption of the growth of the world system no growth/ maximum absorption maximum growth/ no absorption current maximum possible amount for conversion from conventional currencies x,x eT/time unit
My personal voice of money is to weigh less, than the system has computed.
The portion of my personal possession on of my money voice has
no weight
full weight computed by the system.
The portion from my personal donated taxes of my money voice has
no weight
full weight computed by the system.
List of Humans condemned by world system (including those temporarily excluded from the system)
Further down on the side: the eParliament: List of the world-wide most important discussion contributions. Selectable search-masks in order to resort the list according to individual needs.
The Terra is only a beginning. Taxes are donated to the system. To use this money in a good way requires the discussion between and the decision by the members. How do states develop? We speak with one another and agree on common money. In the world state we use the Terra and (in order to cut gasoline costs) the on-line discussion group. Each member can open a group of discussions at any time to whatever topic. Measured is the number of up following contributions, the frequency of the attendance, as well as an assessment of quality of the discussion contribution by its readers. A weighting is calculated from this. For the evaluation of the quality of a contribution by the reader we differentiate a controller for the quality of contents of a contribution and a controller for the estimation of the importance of the discussed affair. Contributions which cause many answering contributions/which are read by a larger number of members, or contributions, which are qualitatively higher estimated, or contributions whose matters are estimated to be of higher importance will thus slip upwards in the ranking. It`s a bit like a constantly current, interactive and global “If there were elections today”- television broadcast.
Parliament - of “parlare” = to speak. More precise to speak and to listen - thus information flow. To write and to read likewise makes information flow. Based on the information flow, that will rush through the new world eParliament already after short time, the conventional parliaments including the World Security Council will soon appear to us like the silence of the forest.
There are affairs, which have global consequences. It must be possible for each human to express himself to such global affairs and to influence the decisions, which are to be taken. This is ensured in the world system. There are however just as local affairs in the world, yes, actually there are quite a lot of them. Perhaps don’t I have the time to decide on the fact whether a new coastal road is to be constructed in Angola or how the potable water supply for Osaka can be improved? Perhaps I mean it has no value for me that I engage myself on these issues (though I could do so). Other local affairs however, which might be indifferent to the very major part of mankind, concern me. This is where I would like to have influence as well. Great importance has a clever listing of communication in the world parliament. It must be possible for each member to easily come through to issues which interest him and which he wants to decide on. This is done by applying certain search-masks on the worldwide discussion contributions. A members bare interest on an affair, navigating and reading a discussion contribution is already an act of election. By changing his evaluation controllers the member can take further influence, by writing an own follow up discussion contribution his influence rises even more. Commitment is recompenced with influence. At the first login the program window shows the lower half a list of the ten most important discussion contributions in the world eParliament. Each member have his list resorted applying the search masks on it. The following parameters are conceivable:
A global decentralized on-line eParliament will develop, where laws are provided and resolutions are seized. Writing a first draft for this eParlament-Program probably might not be quite easy. The program ready to work must be capable to add new modules to itself, it must be able to change and remove existing ones. It must be possible to simulate drafts to new modules, develop them, and re-simulate them. There must be a global discussion and a majority decision on their application. The performance of the program must be enormous, because within a short time the eParliament will achieve high complexity. It will become a mirror of our world, especially in its tremendous complexity. Each human can look at the horizon, not further. It is like that when you live on a very large ball. No human can grasp the whole, not even from the International Space Station (from there anyhow you see hardly half of the world and you are too far away to recognize sufficiently). If so far nobody could grasp the whole, then now with the world system everybody can. The impulse for the advancement of the Program will come from its members. They have influence on the weightings by their controllers. They can suggest and by the majority decision introduce new controllers, they can just as well remove existing controllers. The unrestricted mouldability of the world system by its member must be and always remain ensured from the very beginning on. The world system must become like a lump of plastilin modeling clay. In a way it’s like putting the world as a lump of plastilin modeling clay in everybody hands: “Now turn this into something!” It actually is only the members fair portion of the world, that he is holding, to many, many however the lumps will seem to be the whole world. And isn’t it like that, a bit? – It make no difference and no damage either. The main thing is the wholw story works.
To pessimists: The actual change is that a global human consciousness will arise. Since we can think halfway, we slaughter each other and do as - a species - behave like the elephant in the porcelain shop (german proverb?). Why do we do that? Because we forgot the fact that we are humans and do instead think to be Germans or members of any other human sub-group (to the German people: never mind folks, but we still have to do a bit of reparation to the world. Thus please, my dear compatriots, do your good portion on the construction of the world system, finally dissolve your and - all together - also all other nations, flourish and do not provoke me!)
No, it would not be objected if national states would refund within the world system. States are practical organizational subunits of all humans and as such they must be suspended to the evaluation by all humans - like any other fart, which is farted in the world system. States refunding: perhaps important and directly make a call for it! That would be great. So many functioning and good things exist in our present world and should reappear within the world system. Why not whole states? Bad things, those things which do not tune-in, will just by themselves remain outsides the system. Therefore the sub-title: Recommendation for a global system reboot. We completely have to start from scratch. Change of operation system. On computers it’s done that way: 1.) Provide new partition. As such you could see the newsgroup http://de.groups.yahoo.com/group/terrahome/. You reach it from the start page as well. From there we should all together start to construct the new operating system for our entire, beautiful ball-round world. If thn it is ready for the first flight, we start the new system - from then on there will be the new currency Terra at the same as the conventional currencies in the world. That will possibly lead quite fast to large confusion, which the world system intercepts however, as we have put it on with flexibly, as we can improve it fast and as the members, that steer it, react attentively and responsible. If they do not do so, then - if we are very lucky – we will just experience a catastrophic crash of the stock market - afterwards the members will have understood. A 42 meter high tsunami of responsibility of each human for all other humans will run around the globe and the importance of the positioning of the controllers of his account will be clear to everyone, who before had been badlessly playing around on their positioning. The new currency eTerra displaces all conventional currencies in a controlled way. The good structures of the world (perhaps even whole national states) become newly formed in the world system. Old money and old structures disappear. The world is governed by all humans, who live on it, in a not-centralized and global eParliament. Well, ain`t that something?
Our mobile phone (or what will follow) will become our interface to the common global body. From there we elect in the world eParliament, which is formed by all humans. We will change as species, we will be organized a multiple better than today. Contrary to ants we would even be capable to crown us a global queen and to remove her from her throne again if necessary.
Global currency reform: This story with the Euro, folks, that was already pretty good. But here comes the Terra! (examine old Euro posters with “Terra” instead of €)
An additional work advances to mankind: Everybody needs an interface. The mobile phone for electing in the eParliament, model 1, standard edition (also good for telephoning). Everybody. With a bit of an afford it would take us two years to manage this, and it wouldn’t cost us hardly more, than what we blow for war and armament in the same time period. A good way to spend the donated taxes as well.
When first opening an account the default setting of the controller “growth” is minus infinite. By moving up the controller the world system turns “live”. It can grow and, oh, it can make quite some damage to our world. Each member should be conscious of that - already when first changing the position of this controller.
Two further controllers are possible: “modesty controllers” or “voluntary communism controllers”. Everyone can decide whether his money voice is of lighter weight, than the community has decided it (and the system has computed it). Both sizes of concern (possession, donated taxes) can be absorbed separately from each other in their weighting.
My money voice shall weigh less, than the system has computed it.
The portion of my possession on my money voice has
no weight
full weight computed by the system.
The portion from donated taxes on my money voice has
no weight
full weight computed by the system.
Assumption: If many are “modest”, the world system does behave more stable??? If it is like that, the crisis firmness of the world system could be increased by each member individually (certainly connected with a reduction of personal influence on the world)
Before the first execution it is absolutely necessary to provide dynamic computer simulations in a setting as close to reality as possible and to study the behavior of a copied world during a simulated eREvolution under the most diverse conditions. In each case a start of the world system remains a venture. However what venture does remain, when not starting it? A warning system must exist which immediately communicates to the members if unusual, potentially dangerous situations arise in the world system. “Attention! The change of controller x to position y is urgently recommended, otherwise the consequence z is probable”. As a further level of security an emergency mechanism could be programmed. All growth controllers in the system automatically and immediately go on minus infinite. It should be possible for the majority to deactivate this mechanism under certain circumstances to be the able to make a frozen system restart. Computer science faculties of universities may act for something good here by doing research on this. The results of this research must be generally accessible, they must be evaluated and discussed world-wide.
1969 was a year in the time of the cold war. That’s when the Arpanet was developed. If there was a message to be sent through the net from point A to point C, point B - which is on the way from A to C - however was blown away by an atomic bomb, the system had to be able to evade over other points on the net (point D, point E …). This was the idea. Electrons are this fast that it does not make a difference, if they take detours on their journey. The Arpanet was developed with the intention to protect the USA in a possible nuclear war with Soviet Union. The Arpanet was the basis for the Internet. The ability to automatically figure out the best way for the transmission of information between two points is a major column of the Internet and originates from the Arpanet. The flexibility and superiority of such a net grows with each new net-point/member. If one carries up this idea a further stage you come to the world system. Maximum possible information flow amongst humans. Is the degree of information flow perhaps even a measure for culture? We build ourselves a protection shield against ourselves. Against local cranks and their local impulses. The assault of Hitler on Poland certainly would not have been possible in the world system - Bush’s assault on Iraq however probably would have. In the world system though this assault wouldn’t have been implemented locally but by a real world power and it would have only been possible after global agreement and resolution. Neither in the case of Hitler nor in the case of Bush a global resolution was present. Yes, for a transitional phase the world system possibly will have to be able to win wars. Its members possibly will have to enable it for that. Its military power will become the biggest that has ever existed, as the arsenals of all those nations the world system already has integrated into itself, will be at its disposal. Humans will be able to decide and execute global disarmament, when national structures and national money has been transferred into the system and thereby have been displaced. Only then global peace will be able to grow. Oh, we will still argue lively with one another, probably in world-English words, about global birth control and many other issues, and doing so we will render all honor to the fantasy of our species - but we will no longer shoot one another. We will leave the age of war behind us and enter the age of collective intelligence.
The term “Terra” for a new global currency has earlier been used by Bernard Lietaer. Lietaer knows well and thinks about money in an intelligent way (http://www.subventionsberater.de/gier/lietaervi.html). I changes my original Name “Terra” to “eTerra” in August 03. It seems better to me. It has this e for Justice.
Taxes: The weight of the money voice is calculated by the factor donated taxes/possessed eTerra
In addition for every controller the average positioning of all members in the system is indicated, as well as the average controller position of all members, that are logged in momentarily. The current tendencies can be read by looking at the respective process graphs.
It appears to me that the different controllers are quite similar to the flight controlling of a helicopter. To raise up in the air with an untrained crew however remains risky (and regarding vagueness and complexity my draft of the program surface already approaches that of a helicopter cockpit as well)
A certain degree at unlawfulness adheres to revolutions. So far the success of revolutions depended a fine balance between the relinquishment of information towards the right humans and the restraint of information towards all other humans. For an overcome initial phase it seemed to me, as if I had to establish the world system secretly, in the hidden, first with the lowest possible number of members (I think, in order to be functional, the system must at least have three members). I thought only then, when everything is established, I might step out into the public with my project. That’s how it seemed to me for a fortunately overcome initial phase. My impression was basically wrong, and the considerations I concluded out of it were potentially lethal for the species Homo sapiens. Sorry Folks. Now I deliberated myself. If and only if trumpeting out the news about a new-born eREvolution to everybody, like I do, it can work, from the very beginning on a broad basis and hopefully avoiding violence. The more open, the more secure, i m p o r t a n t ! Security cannot be enough important to us. With each attempt to make an utopia real, one can also blow it. And if we’d do so, then we would for good reason face history just as the fool of a Soviet or American President, that at times of the cold war had pushed the red button (fortunately he has not done so, otherwise these lines could not be read here). Security cannot be important enough to us. Therefore open. Only who trusts, is trusted. Humans are as good, as the ideas they are following. They also are as bad, as the ideas they are following. A well-known German-speaking dictator and its adherents supplied a magnificent example for this in the second third of the past century with the inexpressibly stupid attempt to make a Nazi utopia real. National socialism has a strong message, which partly explains its former temporary success. The strength of an idea shows up in its consequences. Likewise does its quality. Also in national socialism the concern was a unification of mankind. From beginning on Hitler & Co. excluded non-arians from mankind – and thus it was nothing but as the old well-known panic-making from cannibalistic times, with which we humans are about to hinder one another already since thousands and ten thousands of years. The world system will attract Nazis. They will try to spread their wrong and bad ideas by means of the world system and they will fail to do so because mankind in the meantime has learned to differentiate a good from a bad idea. The successful turning down of the Nazism was the victory of the better idea over a worse idea (Nazism was the lousiest idea of recent mankind, my idea is supposed be the opposite of that). Humans are as good, as the ideas they follow. The world system will offer a home Nazis as well (as they are humans just as we all are). Their money will be welcome in the world system. They may act there and they have the same rights as all other humans. Their influence however will remain insignificant. Trust me - it’s good for you!
The hardst judgment that the global eCourt of Justice can pronounce on a human, is the eternal exclusion from the community. Deletion of the membership, loss of the voice in the world system, repayment of all possession of Terra in conventional currency, or the eternal refusal of entry into the world system, in case the person concerned is not yet member of the world system. This judgment is similar to death penalty. Accordingly careful it should be pronounced. A single click on the right spot of the program surface makes a list of humans condemned by the global eCourt of Justice come up. I suggest to open this list, by posthumously excluding Adolf Hitler for ever from a membership in the world system. He deserves this punishment. His name should be on top of the list of those condemned to death. This makes straigt, whom humans do not want on their world and shows how serious this judgment is meant. We do not kill Hitler by that, as he`s already dead, but we show others that we would do so. Other`s names, names of living humans, will possibly follow up. But it will be few names. Perhaps Hitler even remains alone on the list of those excluded for ever? A lighter punishment than death penalty is the temporary exclusion from the world system. The names of those condemned are put on the list. A name remains there for ever except the members decide to remove it. A bad human, who was condemned, but changed and now does good, could be rehabilitated in this way. Another possible punishment apart from temporary exclusion could be a request for tax donation. If a member does not pay, temporary exclusion takes place. However the possession of a condemned member never is confiscated. The system does not steal. If these punishments should not be sufficient, in order to make humankind reasonable, a globally controlled police apparatus must seize individual humans physically and lock them up in globally controlled prisons. It would however be beautiful, if this would not get necessary. The criminality in a world that is governed decentralized by all humans will be small. It might be like that (a non-investigated picture): If a bad wolf continuously bites to death puppies in a herd, the other wolves of the herd will soon bite it to death. Law, as animals handle it. A law, which looks to correct disturbances in the global harmony of nature. Only under such circumstances killing is beneficial to the whole, it is good and it is right.
A close person said to my idea: That is a virus. He was right. The actual act of your infection - reader and responsible world citizen! - is already carried out. Hardly never in your life will the hope that somewhat as my idea could get real yield from you. Even if you dismiss my idea now, the breath of hope, which already has settled itself down into your consciousness, will continue. Thus my actual task is finished. What follows up is a little editing from personal demands (and some efforts to hype the whole story). Editing makes reading more pleasant for you and therefore accelerates the establishment of the world system. It changes nothing about the fact anymore that my dream now is your dream too. And it will remain.
A friend suggested: THC (Terra Home Community). There is something to it. If there should really be a need for abbreviation, then like this! Well, we’ll get that done.
I will consequently talk to mankind as to a friend. Exaggerated politeness is for people I potentially consider to be cannibals. This assumption in case of mankind however would be wrong. I believe, reader, that your intelligence is stronger than the vestiges from old time which are living inside all of us. Your intelligence will win against these forces. On you is based all my hope, you have my full confidence.
Evolution, revolution, both terms do not describe the desired procedure. It is both and it is more than both.

eRevolution
electric revolution or twisted re-evolution = development with help of electronics or mirrored regression, thus development.
Evolution = a contemplative village. Bad: a poisonous gas attack on it. After minutes it looks sad there. Revolution = a formula 1 Ferrari engine when scarcely at 21.000 revolutions per second. Bad: a piston rod break. Within fractions of a second the oil squirts through the crushed crankshaft housing. Revolution is a part of today’s evolution, it is evolution accelerated by intelligence. We do need very, very good brakes.
Self criticism or “there are errors!”: The account balance does not reflect the possessions of a person. If someone owns fifteen dwelling houses but only has 9 Terra fifty on his account, what then? The cash flow that goes over the account of a member would be another possible parameter, but also this does not really state anything on someone’s possessions. Shit.
The following subsequent tasks are forthcoming to mankind:
Time is running from now on! Go!
Members can transfer their voice/a part of their voice/their money voice to other members who they consider to be good and clever. Thus the power of decision could be transferred to chieftains. Yes!! That is it. It must be possible for everyone to assign an arbitrary proportioning of his voice to parties, to organizations, to persons, to whatever substructure of the world system.
From my voice I assign:
I keep the other 52% and change my controller settings occasionally like a good world citizen does. If any of the supported does bad, I can immediately retire my voice from him. Great, isn`t it? It is like roulette without zero. We can only win, because we are the bank. Yeah! Or: How to get mankind under one hat.
Ciào fio`i!
Dear intelligent humans,
I don’t know whether you realize whassup here. The
This is your and our chance, this. Some action now, please. Thanks.