In the traditional argument, we start by taking one or more opposing stances, with different group members defending different positions. For creative pursuits this is unproductive, as we may find ourselves sticking to a position merely so as not to lose face.
Six thinking hats proposes we approach by saying:
Six thinking hats says the best decision-making method is to put all the minds onto the task, working towards the same goal, rather than in opposition. Each mindframe or direction of thought is represented by a different color hat.
See also:
I find this to be a cool idea. One possibility would be to have 6 different sub-pages of a page, like "HiveMind/BlueHat?" or something, that would indicate the kind of discussion going on.
Oh, I also did some editing on the page, to try to make it a little clearer.
I have so many thoughts about SixThinkingHats.
Basically:
It's good to be aware of maps, I think, but not to be ruled by them.
lion- natural thinking? what is natural thinking?
walking is natural, and functional. but what about dancing? i think it is a skill that can be developed- to co-operate with someone...
i don't think there is 'natural thinking' that goes much farther than our stomachs. we are trainined to think in many ways. edward de bono observed that we tend to follow the well-worn ruts we are used to... his concept of lateral thinking, for example- helps us get out of our ruts.
i skeptical of what you mean by natural?
What bout CameleonColoredHat?? Going wild and afterwards analysing what the color of your hat was, how it changed and what the reasons for the change were.
I have too many responses for you. 
I'll have 10,000 pages of text for you if I don't tie it to this particular question:
I think that holding meetings with SixThinkingHats as the basis is too algorithmic and inflexible. That's because it tells you the types of thoughts that you must think; Or rather, they types of communications that you must make.
I'd be fine with trying it out, just to see what it feels like; Sort of like I'm fine with taking a hit of LSD to see what that's like. But I wouldn't make it a norm for operation.
The principle is: I think it is good to radically change your way of thinking now and then, either by SixThinkingHats, or by some other method. But again: Doing it constantly- doesn't make much sense to me.
On the larger question of "natural" vs. "unnatural," you can get a feel for it by considering, say, "indiginous folk lore" vs. "the Church of Scientology." One is natural, the other is not, but they have very similar purposes. And it's not about "institutional" vs. "non-institutional." There are many institutional churches and ways of thinking that strike me as having a "natural" quality to them, and many that strike me as having an "unnatural" quality to them.
The conversation blooms out into myriad interesting subjects and ideas.
But; We have only so much time, and we'd like to keep the page focused.